|
Mona
Charen
October 25, 2002
Mothers unbound
On Oct. 29, that bastion of feminism (and for what it's
worth, my alma mater), Barnard College, will host a conference
on motherhood.
Don't yawn. This is news. When I was a student at Barnard
20-odd years ago, the wish to become a mother was something
one only whispered about. To admit such a thing openly was
to mark yourself as a reactionary. The point of the women's
movement, we were given to understand, was to free women
from all that. Volumes of feminist literature detailed the
drudgery, boredom and depression motherhood inevitably entailed.
Any suggestion that we bright, ambitious Ivy-League gals
might look forward to motherhood was indignantly squelched.
Betty Friedan called the suburban home a "comfortable
concentration camp." And feminists of various stripes
argued that women needed neither men nor children for happiness,
merely one another. Sisterhood was powerful.
But along the way, women's essential nature kept impolitely
reasserting itself. Though millions of women have happily
taken advantage of the career opportunities now available
to them (and, to be fair, feminists deserve some of the
credit for making this possible), the newly liberated continued
to make marriage and family a priority even when it meant
earning the scorn of feminists and others.
The feminist response to the motherhood urge has, until
now, taken the form of agitating for "quality child
care." In other words, they want the government to
care for children so that women can be free to flex their
muscles in the marketplace. But millions of women, including
many who consider themselves to be essentially feminist
in philosophy, cannot be reconciled to handing their kids
off to others to raise. Millions have sacrificed added income
and professional prestige in order to color sailboats, bake
gingerbread men and rock their toddlers to sleep in the
afternoons. They do this not because "quality child
care" is too expensive or too difficult to find, but
because they believe that the best care can come only from
the child's mother who loves that baby with an irrational
and fierce attachment.
So it raises an eyebrow to see that Barnard College is joining
with the Institute for American Values to host this conference
on "maternal feminism." Janet Jakobsen, director
of the Barnard Center for Research on Women, affirms that
"caring for children is vastly undervalued in U.S.
society, and we need a wide range of policies that will
make the choices faced by parents less onerous." Enola
Aird, director of the Motherhood Project at the Institute
for American Values, believes: "For too long, feminism
and motherhood have been on uneasy terms. They need not
be. We must broaden our understanding of feminism to more
fully include the needs and concerns of mothers and children."
Hoping to call a truce in the "mommy wars," Aird
notes that mothers can no longer be neatly divided into
two camps -- those who work and those who are stay-at-home
moms. Technology has made it possible for many mothers to
work part-time from home (including your humble servant).
This may come as news to undergraduates. A few years ago,
asked to speak to journalism students about balancing career
and family, I told a room full of 21- and 22-year-olds that
women who want children have to plan their careers accordingly.
If you want to be a doctor, you may not be able to manage
as a trauma surgeon. You might want to specialize in radiology
or pathology. If you want to be a lawyer, being a partner
in a big firm is not the way to go. The young women in the
audience were disgusted with me. I was a "sexist"
and a throwback, they were convinced. No one had ever presented
the choices in that way, I suppose.
But motherhood is an integral part of life for most women
-- the most important (to say nothing of fulfilling) task
they undertake. And the earlier they learn to integrate
this reality into their planning, the better. Motherhood
clearly deserves greater respect than it currently receives
from the society at large. But a big obstacle to that enhanced
respect has been feminism itself. This conference, and the
movement it aims to start, is one to watch.
©2002 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
|